THE IMPORTANCE OF HANDWRITING EXAMINATION IN CRIMINALISM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/galician_studies/law-2026-13-2Keywords:
evidence, document, personal identification, forensics, criminal proceedings, signature, handwriting examination, forensic examinationAbstract
The article examines the importance of handwriting examination as one of the key tools of forensics in the process of revealing and investigating criminal offenses. It is substantiated that handwriting examination plays an important role in establishing the truth in a case, in particular when identifying a person by handwritten texts, signatures and other written objects. The main tasks of forensic handwriting examination are analyzed, including determining the author of the manuscript, detecting signs of forgery of documents, as well as establishing the conditions for writing. Particular attention is paid to the study of the identification features of handwriting, their individuality and stability, which allows using the results of the examination as appropriate and admissible evidence in criminal proceedings. The problematic aspects of handwriting examination are highlighted, in particular, the complexity of studying intentionally altered or distorted handwriting, the limited comparative material and the influence of external factors (stress, age, health status) on the characteristics of writing. The article also examines the procedural significance of the conclusion of a handwriting expert, his role in proving and evaluating evidence by the court. It is emphasized that a qualitatively conducted handwriting examination contributes to increasing the efficiency of criminal proceedings and prevents judicial errors. Special attention is paid to the need to improve the methods of expert research taking into account modern technologies and digitalization. It is concluded that handwriting examination is an integral part of forensic justice, which has significant evidentiary potential and requires further development in the face of modern challenges.
References
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy (1994). Pro sudovu ekspertyzu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 25.02.1994 № 4038-XII [On forensic examination: Law of Ukraine dated 25.02.1994 No. 4038-XII]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4038-12#Text [in Ukrainian].
Kryminalistyka: pidruchnyk (2023). [Criminology: textbook]. / R.I. Blahuta, O.I. Harasymiv, O.M. Dufeniuk ta in.; za zah. red. Ye.V.Priakhina. 4-te vyd., pererob. i dopov. Lviv: Lvivskyi derzhavnyi universytet vnutrishnikh sprav, 2023. 820 p. Retrieved from: https://dspace.lvduvs.edu.ua/bitstream/1234567890/7336/1/%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B8 %D0%BC%D1%96%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%96%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0% BC%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B5%D1%82_print.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (1998). Pro zatverdzhennia Instruktsii pro pryznachennia ta provedennia sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhen ta Naukovo-metodychnykh rekomendatsii z pytan pidhotovky ta pryznachennia sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhen: nakaz Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy vid 08.10.1998 № 53/5 [On approval of the Instructions on the appointment and conduct of forensic examinations and expert studies and Scientific and Methodological Recommendations on the preparation and appointment of forensic examinations and expert studies: order of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine dated 08.10.1998 No. 53/5]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98#Text [in Ukrainian].
Sudova pocherkoznavcha ekspertyza [Forensic handwriting examination]. Sait Kyivskoho naukovo-doslidnoho instytutu sudovykh ekspertyz Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy – Site of Research Institute of Forensic Examinations of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://kndise.gov.ua/expertise/handwriting-examination [in Ukrainian].
Yuzyshyna, T.V. (2023). Problematyka provedennia sudovo-pocherkoznavchoi ekspertyzy pry identyfikatsiinomu doslidzhenni pocherku ta pidpysiv v elektronnykh dokumentakh [Problems of conducting forensic handwriting expertise in the identification study of handwriting and signatures in electronic documents]. Ekspert: paradyhmy yurydychnykh nauk i derzhavnoho upravlinnia – Expert: Paradigms of Legal Sciences and Public Administration, No. 1 (25). Pp. 56–61. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2023-1(25)-56-61 [in Ukrainian].
Kryminalistyka: Multymediinyi navchalnyi pidruchnyk (2020). [Forensic science: Multimedia textbook]. Natsionalna akademiia vnutrishnikh sprav. Kafedra kryminalistyky ta sudovoi medytsyny. / Antoniuk P.Ye., Antoshchuk A.O., Vakulyk O.O. ta inshi. 2020. Retrieved from: https://arm.navs.edu.ua/books/criminalistics/info/lec6.html [in Ukrainian].
Krasiuk, I.P. (2023). Kryminalistychne doslidzhennia pidpysiv i korotkykh rukopysnykh zapysiv, vykonanykh za dopomohoiu tekhnichnykh pryiomiv ta zasobiv [Forensic research of signatures and short handwritten records performed with the help of use technical techniques and tools]. Doctor’s thesis in the specialty 081 “Law”. Irpin, State Tax University, Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://ir.dpu.edu.ua/items/f2591fc4-d36e-4769-ae0abc220fadb947 [in Ukrainian].
Svoboda, Ye., Hryhorovych, T., & Kravets, V. (2025). Zastosuvannia matematychnoho analizu pry vyznachenni identyfikatsiinykh oznak pocherku (praktychnyi aspekt) [Application of mathematical analysis in determining handwriting identification signs (practical aspect)]. Aktualni problemy pravoznavstva – Current Problems of Law. Issue 2. Pp. 118–125. Retrieved from: https://appj.wunu.edu.ua/index.php/appj/article/view/2135 [in Ukrainian].
Kosyhina, N., & Sakaliuk, V. (2023). Problemni pytannia pidhotovky ta oformlennia eksperymentalnykh zrazkiv pocherku (tsyfrovykh zapysiv, pidpysu) dlia provedennia sudovo-pocherkoznavchykh ekspertyz [Problem issues of preparation and designation of experimental handwriting samples (digital recordings, signatures) for forensic handwriting examinations]. Aktualni pytannia vdoskonalennia sudovo-ekspertnoi ta pravookhoronnoi diialnosti: Zbirnyk materialiv zasidannia № 5 postiino diiuchoi Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii – Current Issues of Improving Forensic Expertise and Law Enforcement Activities: Collection of Materials of Meeting No. 5 of the Permanent International Scientific and Practical Conference. Kropyvnytskyi. Pp. 285–289. Retrieved from: https://ondise.minjust.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/zbirnik_24.03.2023_kropivnickiy.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2012). Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012.No. 4651-VI [Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine from March 13 2012. No. 4651-VI]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#n1180 [in Ukrainian].
Kravets, V. (2023). Osoblyvosti vyznachennia identyfikatsiinykh oznak pocherku za tochkamy na traiektorii pocherkovykh obiektiv [Features of determining handwriting identification signs by points on the trajectory of handwriting objects]. Aktualni pytannia vdoskonalennia sudovo-ekspertnoi ta pravookhoronnoi diialnosti: Zbirnyk materialiv zasidannia № 5 postiino diiuchoi Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii – Current Issues of Improving Forensic Expertise and Law Enforcement Activities: Collection of Materials of Meeting No. 5 of the Permanent International Scientific and Practical Conference. Kropyvnytskyi. Pp. 290–293. Retrieved from: https://ondise.minjust.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/zbirnik_24.03.2023_kropivnickiy.pdf [in Ukrainian].
