THE EXPERIENCE OF FAR EASTERN COUNTRIES IN THE FIELD OF EXTRAJUDICIAL OVERSIGHT OF THE ACTIVITIES OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ENTITIES IN THE SPHERE OF ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITY

Abstract

The scientific publication is devoted to the study of the experience of Far Eastern countries in the field of extrajudicial oversight of the activities of public administration entities in the sphere of entrepreneurial activity. It is noted that, in the context of the growing role of the state as a regulator of economic processes, institutions of extrajudicial oversight acquire particular significance, as they make it possible to respond promptly to violations of the rights of business entities without the need to resort to lengthy and costly judicial procedures. It has been established that Far Eastern countries demonstrate effective models combining administrative supervision, mediation institutions, ombudsman mechanisms, specialized complaint review bodies, and digitalized procedures for interaction between business and the state. The study of this experience is considered appropriate given that these states have succeeded in establishing systems of administrative oversight aimed not only at ensuring compliance with legislation by public authorities, but also at creating a favorable environment for entrepreneurial development, minimizing administrative pressure, and increasing the level of trust in public administration. The conducted study makes it possible to conclude that, from a comparative perspective, the experience of Japan is valuable for Ukraine as an example of a culture of reconciliation, administrative dialogue, and the priority of non-judicial dispute resolution; the experience of the Republic of Korea serves as a model of digital, transparent, and accessible administrative oversight; and the experience of the People’s Republic of China illustrates strict anti-corruption accountability and state policies aimed at eliminating administrative barriers for business. It is emphasized that an optimal Ukrainian model could combine the Japanese orientation toward mediation, the Korean digitalization of procedures, and the Chinese principle of the inevitability of liability for corruption-related offenses, while implementing these elements within the framework of European standards of the rule of law, proportionality, transparency, and judicial oversight. Such a synthesis would make it possible to establish an effective system of extrajudicial oversight over the activities of public administration entities in the sphere of entrepreneurship, which would not replace judicial protection but rather complement it through rapid, accessible, and preventive administrative-law mechanisms.